Make the text larger. Make the text size smaller. Print this page. Bob works in Human Resources. Privately, Bob often speaks to various public interest and civic-minded groups about corporate social responsibility.
He is a conscientious, long-serving public servant employee, and has an excellent record. In speaking at a local Council meeting, he learned that a particular group is trying to raise money to fund a community centre.
There is no question about the benefit such a centre would be to the community. The group has started to plan their fund-raising project, but they appear to be totally bereft of funds. What they need in the first instance are leaflets for promotional letter-dropssome posters, and a bit of artwork.
This will start the ball rolling to get the wider local community involved and interested. They believe that more funds and community support will then pour in. Without some help from someone, there is a strong possibility that the community centre might never get off the ground, for lack of public awareness — and so lack of initial public support.
Bob realises that he is in a position to volunteer some help, and he is confident that some of his work colleagues would be willing to help also. They could produce leaflets and posters for the community group afterhours at the agency.
They would take no time away from their jobs. They would use some agency resources, however, but that would be minor: five reams of paper, size A3 posterboards, markers, a computer, printer, and photocopier. This is correct. Perhaps Bob and his work colleagues, with the approval of management, could canvas staff in the agency to help the community group in another way, in their own time, and to donate or make available their own resources.
Browse by topic. What are you looking for? More Results Close. What should Bob do?A project team designs a software application for a financial services company. Kyle, a new and less experienced team member, is in charge of reporting. When Judy finishes her design ahead of schedule, she moves on to another project.
Steve, the team leader, tells the team they have to rework the entire solution. He distributes a report detailing the reasons the financial services firm rejected the design.
Judy reads the report and sees there are no comments about the user interface. The main issues are data management and reporting. The thing is, Judy started her career designing reports, and she sensed Kyle was struggling. She finished the user interface design and moved on to other work.
This scenario sheds light on one of the challenges of working on a team. Many of us have been on teams where we had to do most of the heavy lifting. We know what the team needs to produce for a successful outcome. Not really. We think the answer is a resounding yes! To build high-performing teams, you need to value team accountability over individual accountability.
In other words, the team outcome is more important than individual team member outcomes. The software application is more important than the user interface or reporting designs. We all want to reap the rewards of team success.
But it can be difficult to share accountability for team failure. It eliminates blame. Instead, teams that share accountability learn from shared experience and plan for improvement together. Everybody wins. Leaders invest significant resources into team development. Team-building considerations include personality types, thinking styles, working styles etc.
These ensure team members understand each other and get along. But there also has to be a tangible component to unify the team. Shared accountability is the tangible that brings teams together. It may seem scary. Does that mean you need to jump-in and take on extra work?
Not necessarily, but there may be times when you have to pitch in. A team that shares accountability does not leave a team member in the lurch. They collaborate to find solutions. There is a way for teams to create a culture of shared accountability proactively.Traditional management practices have led many entrepreneurs to believe that employee engagement and happiness come from a working environment that is free of stress or problems.
Unfortunately, many have already fallen prey to this form of emotional blackmail, investing great amounts of capital in employee requests for perks and benefits based on nothing more than the promise that they will deliver extraordinary results in return. You see, while fulfilling employee requests may initially seem like a logical approach to motivation, the reality is much different. According to New York Times bestselling author Shawn Achor90 percent of your long-term happiness is predicted not by the external world, but by the way your brain processes the world.
To cultivate sustainable engagement that produces results for your business, focus instead on making your employees bulletproof by teaching them to be personally accountable.
Once someone begins to view the world through a lens of accountability, they start to understand that they can affect their circumstances and situations. This mindset equips them to handle anything that comes their way, regardless of how challenging it is. So, how can you help your team achieve a greater sense of accountability at work? First, you must understand that personal accountability is a product of both nature and nurture. Some individuals possess a higher natural inclination towards accountability, but it can also be learned.
Experiencing projects, assignments and tasks that have a significant risk of failure and call employees out of their comfort zones will enhance the learning and development of new and less developed competencies.
From there, they can adapt and move forward. Being held accountable on a consistent basis by people and processes molds the mindset of internal accountability. Regular developmental and performance feedback from a credible source helps employees understand and internalize how their specific behaviors and choices are contributing to their results. However, the feedback must be rigorous, consistent and ongoing to be effective.
Methods of self-reflection include meditation and journaling. Armed with this knowledge, you will be able to adopt a different, more sustainable approach to employee engagement. It all begins with cultivating and celebrating personal accountability among employees at every level within your organization. Not only will they raise the bar for everyone around them, they will make great things happen for your business as well. Entrepreneur Media, Inc. In order to understand how people use our site generally, and to create more valuable experiences for you, we may collect data about your use of this site both directly and through our partners.
Image credit: Shutterstock. Cy Wakeman. Guest Writer. January 19, 4 min read. Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. More from Entrepreneur. Get heaping discounts to books you love delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Now. Jumpstart Your Business. Entrepreneur Insider is your all-access pass to the skills, experts, and network you need to get your business off the ground—or take it to the next level. Join Now. Guidant Financial works to make financing easy for current and aspiring small business owners by providing custom funding solutions, financing education, and more.
Ultimate Guide to Link Building.Nothing is more energizing than having great ideas fly around a meeting room and everyone is engaged in solving problems and getting things done. In tough economic times, seeing employees express ideas about how to keep the business booming is especially rewarding. You want to keep these great expectations moving from one meeting to the next and ensure that the best ideas are not allowed to stall.
Those ideas are gold and the miners of that gold are in the room. And why does nothing get done? I am especially excited about customers downloading this information. Managers received initial training from Versera Performance Consulting a sister company to CRM Learningand later, several internal employees were certified to teach the program.
At first, trainers used the script directly from the Accountability That Works! Leaders Guide, but later modified training to include company-specific examples. Participant workbooks kept everyone focused, and the format was also broken up into shorter blocks. Leaders reported a significant positive shift in attitudes when it came to making and keeping commitments.
Employees who received the Accountability That Works! Like it or not, all teams are potentially dysfunctional. This is inevitable because they are made up of fallible, imperfect human beings.
From the basketball court to the executive suite, politics and confusion are more the rule than the exception. However, facing dysfunction and focusing on teamwork is particularly critical at the top of an organization because the executive team sets the tone for how all employees work with one another. Whenever I repeat this adage to a group of leaders, they immediately nod their heads, but in a desperate sort of way. They seem to grasp the truth of it while simultaneously surrendering to the impossibility of actually making it happen.
Fortunately, there is hope. Counter to conventional wisdom, the causes of dysfunction are both identifiable and curable. Making a team functional and cohesive requires levels of courage and discipline that many groups cannot seem to muster. This exercise from CRM Learning gives participants a chance to use a series of questions to explore and understand the scope and requirements for a project.
Use the questions below to make sure you understand the task before you begin.Current Articles. Get Updates to Exercise Database by Email. While managing a team you may give a series of tasks to various team members.
Each time you delegate a task, you expect a member to perform and deliver results. This leads to the concept of accountability. A well-functioning team must be held accountable for what it does. This exercise is designed to help increase accountability of team members by providing a practical system that can be implemented and used on a daily basis.
Note that this is not an exercise to go through in a training course; instead it is a system to implement. The following description covers the application which can be used for a team with any background or industry. Every time a team member underperforms, he must perform a pre-defined task as punishment to reinforce accountability.
Learn How to Train People Well. Name required Name Is Required. Comment Is Required. Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. Full Index of Training Exercises. Download a free comprehensive training package including training guidelines, soft skills training activities, assessment forms and useful training resources that you can use to enhance your courses. Download Free Training Marterials. Management Training. Personal Development. Interpersonal Development.
Human Resources. We provide training materials on Soft Skills, Management and Productivity.
Blame vs. Accountability Hypothetical Scenarios – Facilitator Answer Key
Learn to teach using train the trainer courses. Download our training resources and extend your portfolio to meet market demand and deliver state-of-the-art interactive training courses. Newsletter and email Updates. Purpose While managing a team you may give a series of tasks to various team members.
Objective Every time a team member underperforms, he must perform a pre-defined task as punishment to reinforce accountability. You can cut A4 papers to this size if you wish. Setup At the next meeting, bring a glass jar and explain how the accountability system works. If your team changes, you can do this at the time of team formation or the beginning of a term. Distribute three pieces of paper to each person.This document briefs the training facilitator on the various scenarios used in the training activity to address the concept of blame.
4 Ways to Teach Personal Accountability to Your Employees
Social Share on Social. Select Social Platform:. Get Access. Speak With Representative Access this content by contacting one of our representatives for assistance. Do not fill in this field. Enter no text in this field. Full Name. Job Title. Related Content Loading Book an Appointment Blame vs.To most of us, accountability has painful connotations. Why has accountability, which is merely a principle of sound managerial practice, gotten such a bad rap?
Sometimes this dubious ploy actually works. But the wear and tear burns people out and suboptimizes the whole. As a managerial technique, holding people accountable after casually tossing a goal or task to them — without setting the context, securing the necessary resources, and providing the proper structure — is destructive.
It generates negative emotions and behaviors and a widespread negative response to the proper and requisite notion of accountability. Nevertheless, accountability leadership is crucial for managers to move forward to more productive ways of doing business.
The essence of employee accountability becomes clear by comparing the role of an employee with that of an independent contractor. A contractor is accountable for delivering a measurable, usually quantifiable, product, service, or result. Repair the roof. Install a phone system. Collect past due accounts.
In the process, the contractor has the absolute right to be paid as long as you receive the value you requested. He is left on his own to create his own processes to secure resources, generate efficiencies, and produce results. Employees, on the other hand, are accountable for delivering value consistent with the total requirements of their role while coordinating with other company processes and functions.
In turn, they have the right to be compensated at a level consistent with the value they contribute. Employees are by law! They also typically receive training, development, and benefits.
But in order to follow through with their commitments, they need the appropriate resources, support, and guidance about expectations about their performance. They are necessary to keep processes in control and can be summarized in two distinct categories:.
Clearly articulated relative accountabilities are the antidote to the pursuit of narrow goals, waste of resources, and lack of team play that renders so many employees, and their companies, ineffective.
Chief among them is being clear with their subordinates about what the quantity and quality of output they are expected to deliver and how much time they have to deliver it.
Managers are also accountable for providing the resources employees need to complete their assignments. Yet statistical process control and just-in-time working require unambiguous clarity about accountabilities and the interaction between quantity, quality, time, and resources.